曾經有一陣子覺得玩Plurk這東西有點浪費生命，但最近發現Plurk這東西熱門的程度遠超過我想像，甚至自已開始把它當成一個"類RSS Reader"了。
剛才發現有一個叫PLURK2的東西，可以將Plurk上的公開討論串轉成JavaScript嵌入到blog上。來試試它會變成什麼樣子：
Clean Style Javascript Code:
Hana Style Javascript Code:
ph2 style Javascript Code:
Plurk Blue style Javascript Code:
Acknowledge Javascript Code:
Vote Javascript Code:
看樣子好像Clean Style與Hana Style比較好看。至於轉po到facebook能不能成功呢？我猜是不行。還來到原始網頁看吧！
6/17/2009
3/15/2009
新版面的FACEBOOK
3/15/2009
0
FACEBOOK終於在昨天換上了新的衣服
這次的改版似乎只有在首頁的部份
朋友們對此改版後的結果也持不一樣的態度
有人覺得清爽許多 也有人覺得很不習慣
基本上我也是屬於後者
根據官方的說法
這次改版有兩大特色
一是版面變得更乾淨 (我…不予置評)
二是首頁的newsfeeds會即時更新
也就是說只要一有新的update
10到15分鐘內網頁就會自動顯示最新的項目 (有嗎？尚待測試)
下面這張圖就是更新過的版面：
對我而言
Facebook其實我拿來是當玩twitter或plurk一樣
真要寫些什麼還是在blog比較有彈性
說到這點
我昨天試了半天
終於找到從blogger同步文章到FACEBOOK不會影響格式的方法
但發現同步後的一些限制
例如字型大小顏色永遠就只有那個樣
影片也會被截掉
還有讓我最詬病的是你永遠不知它什麼時候才會同步過去 (爛！)
等過幾天心情爽時再來把它同步過去FACEBOOK好了
這次的改版似乎只有在首頁的部份
朋友們對此改版後的結果也持不一樣的態度
有人覺得清爽許多 也有人覺得很不習慣
基本上我也是屬於後者
根據官方的說法
這次改版有兩大特色
一是版面變得更乾淨 (我…不予置評)
二是首頁的newsfeeds會即時更新
也就是說只要一有新的update
10到15分鐘內網頁就會自動顯示最新的項目 (有嗎？尚待測試)
下面這張圖就是更新過的版面：
對我而言
Facebook其實我拿來是當玩twitter或plurk一樣
真要寫些什麼還是在blog比較有彈性
說到這點
我昨天試了半天
終於找到從blogger同步文章到FACEBOOK不會影響格式的方法
但發現同步後的一些限制
例如字型大小顏色永遠就只有那個樣
影片也會被截掉
還有讓我最詬病的是你永遠不知它什麼時候才會同步過去 (爛！)
等過幾天心情爽時再來把它同步過去FACEBOOK好了
12/15/2008
Top 40 Automated Testing Blogs
12/15/2008
0
這篇文章是同事David Ko介紹的
作者似乎是以瀏覽數來做判斷
所以不代表這些blog最專業或內容最豐富
但應該是較"熱門"啦
就像David說的
雖然標題是有關automated testing的blog
不過只要是有關software testing的blog
還是值得參考一下啦
http://motevich.blogspot.com/2008/11/top-40-automated-testing-blogs.html
作者似乎是以瀏覽數來做判斷
所以不代表這些blog最專業或內容最豐富
但應該是較"熱門"啦
就像David說的
雖然標題是有關automated testing的blog
不過只要是有關software testing的blog
還是值得參考一下啦
http://motevich.blogspot.com/2008/11/top-40-automated-testing-blogs.html
- PageRank (PR) - Google's view of the importance of a pag. The bigger, the better.
- AlexaRank (AR) - Alexa's range of a site based on a traffic.The lower, the better.
- TechnoratiRank (TR) - position of the blog among all Technorati blogs. The lower, the better.
- Comments (Cmts) - number of comments for all articles posted during previous 3 months (Aug, Sep, Oct 2008). The bigger, the better.
- Incoming links (Links) - number calculated by Yahoo Site Explorer. The bigger, the better.
11/10/2008
Data-Driven Testing
11/10/2008
0
前陣子有人問到什麼是Data-Driven Testing
AutomatedQA的網站上有作了一番解釋
文中提到的TestComplete應該是他們的test tool吧
假裝沒看到它就好
Data-driven testing means that scripts read data from an external storage site, for example, from a file or database, rather than use values hard-coded in the script. Such a separation makes tests logically simpler. A script containing several sets of hard-coded values can be rather difficult to modify. For instance, if you need more input data, you will have to modify the script code.
Normally, the storages hold both input and verifying data. A data-driven test includes the following operations performed in a loop:
完整文章在此：
http://www.automatedqa.com/products/testcomplete/tc_data_driven_testing.asp
至於Wiki上是這麼說的：
Data-driven testing is a methodology used in Test automation where test scripts are executed and verified based on the data values stored in one or more central data sources or databases. These databases can range from datapools, ODBC sources, csv files, Excel files, DAO objects, ADO objects, etc. Data-driven testing is the establishment of several interacting test scripts together with their related data results in a framework used for the methodology. In this framework, variables are used for both input values and output verification values: navigation through the program, reading of the data sources, and logging of test status and information are all coded in the test script. Thus, the logic executed in the script is also dependent on the data values.
This is similar to Keyword-driven testing in that the test case is contained in the data values and not in the test script; the script is just a "driver" or delivery mechanism for the data. Unlike in keyword-driven testing, though, the navigation data isn't contained in the test script. In data-driven testing, only test data is contained in the data source.
AutomatedQA的網站上有作了一番解釋
文中提到的TestComplete應該是他們的test tool吧
假裝沒看到它就好
Data-driven testing means that scripts read data from an external storage site, for example, from a file or database, rather than use values hard-coded in the script. Such a separation makes tests logically simpler. A script containing several sets of hard-coded values can be rather difficult to modify. For instance, if you need more input data, you will have to modify the script code.
Normally, the storages hold both input and verifying data. A data-driven test includes the following operations performed in a loop:
- Retrieving input data from storage.
- Entering data in an application form.
- Verifying the results.
- Continuing with the next set of input data
完整文章在此：
http://www.automatedqa.com/products/testcomplete/tc_data_driven_testing.asp
至於Wiki上是這麼說的：
Data-driven testing is a methodology used in Test automation where test scripts are executed and verified based on the data values stored in one or more central data sources or databases. These databases can range from datapools, ODBC sources, csv files, Excel files, DAO objects, ADO objects, etc. Data-driven testing is the establishment of several interacting test scripts together with their related data results in a framework used for the methodology. In this framework, variables are used for both input values and output verification values: navigation through the program, reading of the data sources, and logging of test status and information are all coded in the test script. Thus, the logic executed in the script is also dependent on the data values.
This is similar to Keyword-driven testing in that the test case is contained in the data values and not in the test script; the script is just a "driver" or delivery mechanism for the data. Unlike in keyword-driven testing, though, the navigation data isn't contained in the test script. In data-driven testing, only test data is contained in the data source.
11/08/2008
If Microsoft is so good at testing, why does your software suck?
11/08/2008
0
這個標題真的很吸引我
內容也還算有趣
有興趣的來這看看吧
http://blogs.msdn.com/james_whittaker/archive/2008/08/11/if-microsoft-is-so-good-at-testing-why-does-your-software-suck.aspx
這篇文章是同事David Ko介紹的
他也有個blog
裏面提到很多有關軟體測試及自動化的文章
很不錯
在此幫他推一下
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/kojenchieh/12879351
內容也還算有趣
有興趣的來這看看吧
http://blogs.msdn.com/james_whittaker/archive/2008/08/11/if-microsoft-is-so-good-at-testing-why-does-your-software-suck.aspx
這篇文章是同事David Ko介紹的
他也有個blog
裏面提到很多有關軟體測試及自動化的文章
很不錯
在此幫他推一下
http://www.wretch.cc/blog/kojenchieh/12879351
訂閱：
文章 (Atom)
